A DC judge denies an attempt to block the police rule of the COVID vaccine

The judge rejected the motion for an interim measure of restraint against the mandate of the vaccine against COVID, writing that the plaintiffs’ request did not meet the court’s criteria for such rulings.

A District of Columbia Supreme Court judge on Wednesday refused to block a county vaccine against COVID-19 affecting police officers.

Judge Joan Zeldan rejected the request on a temporary measure of restraint from the Fraternal Order of Police, the Metropolitan Police Committee, the District of Columbia Police Union and four officers, writing that the plaintiffs’ request did not meet court criteria for such orders.

For example, wrote Zeldan, the police will no be “at risk of irreparable harm” unless a temporary ban is imposed.

Vaccines against COVID-19, Zeldan wrote, have been given to millions of people.

“The plaintiffs claim that the vaccine is an irreversible medical procedure with a risk of serious medical consequences, and it violates their right to bodily integrity and personal autonomy,” Zeldan wrote. “These allegations, although deeply felt by officers who oppose vaccination, are speculative.”

Under the DC mandate, officers who fail to comply with it by Feb. 15 will be subject to disciplinary action, but Zeldan noted that no action can be taken until a month later, March 15, and that removing the officer will be after a series of steps starting with “verbal counseling. ».

“Although this judge is sympathetic to an officer who does not want the disciplinary action that may be taken against him or her record,” Zeldan wrote, “the choice to undergo the vaccine process is an officer’s choice.”

In addition, such an order would not serve the public interest, the judge wrote, and DC’s interest in protecting the health and safety of its employees and the public from the coronavirus “outweighs the potential harm faced by the plaintiffs.”

The administrative challenge for the vaccine policy is now before the Civil Service Liaison Council, which is considering labor disputes between DC agencies and staff. This challenge is addressed by the Office of Labor Relations and Collective Bargaining and the City Hall.

County Attorney General Carl Racine responded to the decision on Twitter.

WTOP asked for comments from the plaintiffs’ lawyers.

More news about the coronavirus

Looking for more information? The District of Columbia, Maryland and Virginia are releasing more data every day. Visit their official websites here: Virginia | Maryland | DC

As on WTOP Facebook and follow WTOP further Twitter and Instagram join the conversation on this article and others.

Get the latest news and daily headlines to your inbox by signing up here.

© 2022 WTOP. All rights reserved. This website is not intended for users in the European Economic Area.

Source link