COVID rules are relaxed; recall notes – Washington Square News

Editor’s Note – This is a weekly newsletter from the WSN Editor-in-Chief that brings you the main articles of the week – and the stories behind those articles.

Hello everyone!

Welcome to the next edition of the Editor’s Notes.

This newsletter was a kind of promise to its readers that we will tell you about some of them decisions that happen behind the scenes. Earlier this week we made one such decision and I think we should retell you our process.

But first, here’s the headline news of the week.

This week’s news

On Friday, New York began easing restrictions on COVID-19. On Monday, NYU students will be able to eat in the dining room, meet in person, exercise in gyms, visit each other in dormitories and more. Students are expected to attend classes in person. The level of positivity at COVID at the university has fallen from the peak of the omicron to less than one percent above the level of autumn 2021.

Angela Davis discussed Black’s global consciousness at a virtual event hosted by New York University’s Abu Dhabi to launch New York University’s Black History Month events and MLK Week. Keep scrolling to read more about this article.

A Rally on February 1 in Lower Manhattan protested against anti-Asian hatred a year after an 84-year-old Thai American was killed in San Francisco and two weeks after Michelle Go was killed at Times Square subway station. Guo’s death and more Subway crime is troubling some New York University students.

Art and culture

No one likes to hate NYU like NYU students. Joyce Lee spoke to three anonymous administrators behind my personal favorite NYU meme page, NYU Affirmations.

Celebrated by Alexei Tran bitter lunar New Year.

Mickey’s new album “Laurel Hell” is her first in four years and completes a two-year hiatus. I wrote about how the album was both dark and dancing.

“On on the intersection of Phoebe Bridgers and Japanese Breakfast 25-year-old Samia Finerti, ”Lorena Kempes writes her review of Samia’s concert in East Village.

WSN columns

Listen to this reviewed the posthumous issue of XXXTENTACION and new tracks from Rex Orange County, Wallows and others.

Soap dish recalled the killings of Mexican journalistsmilitia attacks in the Congo and the death of an ISIS leader during a U.S. raid.

Monday edition The Daybook will feature a concert by the New York Philharmonic on the Lunar New Year (Tuesday, 7:30 p.m.) and an exhibition at the National Jazz Museum inspired by Pixar’s “Soul” (opens on Thursday). Check your inbox on Monday morning to find out what else needs to be done next week.


Chief Justice John Roberts has long argued for the political independence of the Supreme Court. Judge Stephen Breer is set to resign, “It’s time for the chief judge to prove what he means.” house this week editorial claims. (John Harris of Politico joined us on Thursday urging Roberts resign.)

Campus opening was the right callwrites Alexander Cohen.

A letter to editor from a former student of the English Institute of New York University mourns The “tragic” loss of ELI.

Shrishti Bungle criticizes representation of marginalized people in “Euphoria.” Sade Collier the representation of fat in particular is considered. (If you’re like me and don’t watch the show, but want to keep up, because “Euphoria” is all that anyone else publishes, Shreya Wankhad summed up the episodes three and four for our table Arts.)

Behind the scenes of our recall process

What happened?

Early Thursday afternoon, management was told that there were some problems with the article we published this morning – some serious problems. The article, which was posted in our news section, covered a virtual discussion of global black consciousness that launched the programs of MLK Week and Black History Month at New York University.

The author of the WSN news, who also covered the event, noted that there were quotes that have been reproduced incorrectly, and the mistakes did not stop there. There were cases when the author allegedly confused who was speaking and attributed quotes and excerpts to the wrong person. The quotes seemed to have been rewritten from memory, not records.

This news author, however, had a record and a transcript. They gave our news editors and managing a team with a list of bugs and why they are important and we immediately saw the problem.

These errors are in the transcription of quotations perceived the event in a misleading direction – due to the fact that these quotes were wrong, the way of describing the event became inaccurate. The author’s initial interpretation of the meaning and context of the conversation was not based on what the speakers actually said.

It happened that this happened when I was going to a photo shoot for the profiles of our employees, so I was able to discuss what was happening with the news editors and most of the management team.

I talked to our management editor on the phone when going to filming, then with the staff involved who were there, then on the phone with our advisor. We concluded that, given the fundamental mistakes that were made, a recall was needed. Even thorough corrections would not be enough to bring to justice for violations of journalistic honesty.

On the same day, we made a statement, which will be posted on the page:

On Thursday, February 3, WSN published an article about an online seminar organized by the New York University of Abu Dhabi with Angela Davis. This article does not conform to WSN editorial standards and has been repealed. The article misquoted and misrepresented people, and was hidden from the WSN website at 1:50 p.m. that day. WSN regrets the error.

We also had to decide how we would launch a new article to replace the selected one. In the end, we decided that our posts on social media advertising the new article would include a note on involvement in a way that b see our audience without blackout new, correct article. A new article and posts on social media appeared on Friday morning.

Why did we issue a recall instead of a correction?

Journalists avoid recalls at any cost. We do our best to avoid the need to recall the story in the first place, and then we do it only when it is really necessary. At first I didn’t think it was necessary in this case.

At first I wanted to fix this with a correction. I thought that if we corrected the quotes, added a correction notice at the beginning of the story and posted on social media to inform our audience about the mistake, that would be enough.

That has changed how I understood the scale of the problem and how the wrong quotes affected the rest of the story. It became clear to me that the errors that occurred were not just transcription errors – there were procedural failures in reporting, writing and editing process that were not only the responsibility of the writer.

Given our news editors about the severity of the errors, from the rest of our steering group on how to respond to them, and from our consultant on how to implement the recall, I decided to give up.

Why did we remove the article from the site?

We don’t want there to be wrong information, even if it is in order to show our mistakes. Even with a recall notice, leaving the page up will disrespect people who have been misquoted.

That’s why we removed the text of the original article – replacing it with a revocation statement – and removed it (without deleting it) from our site. This is not because we don’t want people to see that we made a mistake (if it were, you wouldn’t be reading this newsletter), but because it doesn’t serve our readers as much as our other articles. which actually give them useful news and comments.

The goal I think we have achieved is to make it harder to find than our other pages, leaving the page itself intact as a record of an error.

Why am I telling you all this?

One of my priorities is both editor-the main thing is transparency – I want to give you, our reader, a better idea of ​​what is happening behind the scenes of WSN. It was one of the values ​​that made me start this newsletter.

Withdrawal is one of those processes that is common hidden from the public, and intentionally. Some publications try to hide the error by silently deleting pages or hiding edits.

I don’t want to exacerbate our failure too much, but in every mistake there is an opportunity to learn. I think this is a chance for our audience to learn about it how we make such decisions as well as for us to learn to avoid something like this happening again.

I hope that our handling of this error will restore the trust you have lost for us as a result of this article.

How will we prevent these mistakes in the future?

How editor-Main, I must hold myself personally responsible for such mistakes. In this case, it’s not just that I’m overseeing the publication – I was the one who made the last round of edits and uploaded the article to our site.

The author of the article has some responsibility for these errors, and we discussed them with them, but ultimately what we publish is editor– the responsibility of the chief. i believe in it any blame should lie on me, not on the writer. While I stand by our work when it deserves protection, I acknowledge our mistakes when we make them. Part of that responsibility is to do everything I can make sure it doesn’t happen again.

The first step is to emphasize the importance of properly processing and reproducing quotes to our employees. Previously scheduled staff training this week will pay extra attention to accurately recording quotes and interpreting their meaning.

Ours editors will also be more careful to ensure that their authors have recordings or credible transcripts of any interviews they conduct or events they cover. In the future, we will not hesitate to keep articles with suspicious citations until records or transcripts are received.

We hope we don’t have to respond again. But if we do, we are more willing to deal with it because of this experience.

In conclusion

All publications seek to avoid the need for corrections and revocations, but sometimes there will be errors that need to be corrected. I don’t want to amplify this mistake, but I want to own it. I felt that you, the reader, deserved explanation how these decisions occur.

Thank you for enduring me through this longer than usual Editor‘s Note. (You can now view past editions of this newsletter at As always, you can send emails to editor office [email protected], and feel free to contact me directly by email below. You can also find me on Twitter at @teythemtheirs.

That’s all this week. Until next Saturday,

– editor

Alex Tay
she / they

Source link