Eric Adams needs to place the homeless, not attack them – Washington Square News

Mayor Adams wants to make our trains safer by removing people who are not in the home. His plan, unfortunately, relies heavily on police and other forms of violence.

Michelle Guo was tragically pushed before her death at the subway station by a non-resident on 15 January. Her death sparked much-needed talk of rising crime in the New York subway. This conversation is not limited to Guo’s death; in fact, New Yorkers have felt since the beginning of the pandemic in the subway less and less safe.

February 18 Mayor Eric Adams announced his security plan in the subway to eliminate the lack of security experienced by New Yorkers. The plan offers 30 response teams that will consist of members from the Department of Health, the Department of Homeless Care, the New York City Police Department and community groups. The plan also envisions training New York City’s transportation service staff to more closely follow metropolitan transportation management regulations, which include preventing sitting in seats, throwing trash, using drugs, or using the subway system for anything other than transportation.

Another important aspect of Adams ’security plan is proposed addition with almost 500 SafeHaven and stabilization beds – a transitional housing program which has several rules and regulations. Department of Social Services Commissioner Gary Jenkins said safe havens and stabilization facilities were “new beds”, but he gave no specifics: how long will people be allowed to stay? How often were they allowed to use these beds?

“You can’t apply a band-aid to a cancerous wound” said Adams. describing how his plan will thoroughly address subway security issues and provide assistance to non-residential communities. “You have to remove the cancer and start the healing process.”

His statement was rightly criticized by the nonprofit The coalition is in defense of the homeless who were concerned when they heard his comparison of the elderly to cancer.

“They are people” said Shelley NorthDeputy Executive Director of the Policy Group.

Even more frustrating is Adams ’general lack of support from organizations seeking to give New Yorkers resources and support. Adams ’preliminary budget will be cut DHS funding for $ 500 million. From July 1, the city will also allocate less money to adult shelters.

Adrienne Adams, speaker of the New York City Council, said compliance with MTA rules should not criminalize “people in need of housing or treatment.”

Unfortunately, Mayor Adams ’plan seems to be doing just that. As many homeless and mental health groups point out, this plan does more for criminalization unsettled and mentally ill than provide long-term, sustainable solutions that work to end cycles of homelessness.

Although Adams insists the plan does not involve arresting people, it simply does not support the necessary infrastructure needed to properly produce alternative outcomes. If that plan wasn’t about arrest, then why include New York City police in response groups at all? What will his response teams really do if they come across an out-of-home person who violates MTA rules? Many people in need of asylum, medical care due to drug addiction or serious mental health treatment will simply be sent to jail or detained in another punitive suspension and will not receive the necessary care.

What we need to do is just accommodate the non-residents.

Eric Adams ’plan to eliminate homelessness relies too heavily on detaining and punishing the homeless rather than helping them. By doing so, Adams doesn’t actually address the security concerns faced by many New Yorkers on the subway, but instead perpetuates an endless cycle of homelessness. Time and time again it has been shown that the criminalization of homelessness is there expensive and inefficient in addressing the challenges faced by many homeless people. The Adams Plan is another in a series of ill-planned efforts that ultimately boil down to one thing: extending the NYPD’s power to the city’s most vulnerable residents.

The opinions expressed in the editorial of the House reflect the opinion of the Editorial Board, which consists of the opinion editors, the deputy opinion editors and the editor-in-chief. The editors of the house do not necessarily reflect the views of WSN or its staff.

Contact the editorial office at tel [email protected]

Source link